ABB Robotics IRB 1300vsDoosan Robotics H2017
Side-by-side comparison of ABB Robotics IRB 1300 and Doosan Robotics H2017: specs, price, use cases and SDKs.

IRB 1300
Compact fast-picking industrial arm

H2017
test
Specifications
| Spec | IRB 1300 | H2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $40,000 | $38,000 |
| Category | industrial | industrial |
| Payload | 11 kg | 25 kg |
| Weight | — | 79 kg |
| Reach | 1400mm | 1700mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
- Electronics assembly
- Pick-and-place
- Machine tending
- Heavy palletizing
- Automotive component handling
- Press-tending
- Machine loading
When to pick which
Select the ABB Robotics IRB 1300 for high-speed electronics assembly or precision pick-and-place operations where cycle time and path accuracy are paramount. In high-volume manufacturing facilities with limited floor space, the IRB 1300’s compact design and fast-picking capabilities outperform heavier, slower alternatives. Buyers should choose this model when their deployment requires the mature RobotStudio ecosystem for complex simulation or RAPID programming to synchronize with existing ABB-heavy production lines. The 11kg payload is specifically optimized for small-component handling where agility and rapid acceleration drive the return on investment over raw lifting capacity.
Opt for the Doosan Robotics H2017 for heavy-duty palletizing or automotive component handling where reach and lifting power are the primary constraints. With a 25kg payload and 1700mm reach, this robot is engineered for end-of-line logistics and press-tending tasks that exceed the physical limits of the ABB IRB 1300. At a lower $38,000 price point, it offers superior value for industrial buyers needing to automate the movement of heavy workpieces or stack tall pallets. The H2017 is the better fit for facilities requiring a high-capacity arm that integrates easily via the Dart-Platform or DRL scripting for heavy-duty industrial loading.
Ready to evaluate?
Request a vendor quote or compare more options.