🤖

Apptronik ApollovsTesla Optimus Gen 2

Side-by-side comparison of Apptronik Apollo and Tesla Optimus Gen 2: specs, price, use cases and SDKs.

Specifications

SpecApolloOptimus Gen 2
Price (USD)
$120,000
$30,000
Category
humanoid
humanoid
Payload
25 kg
Runtime
4 h
8 h
Speed
2.5 m/s
Weight
73 kg
57 kg
Degrees of Freedom
28
Shared use cases
  • Logistics
Only on Apollo
  • Manufacturing
  • Warehousing
Only on Optimus Gen 2
  • Factory automation
  • Home assistance

When to pick which

When to pick Apollo

Choose the Apptronik Apollo for heavy-duty logistics and brownfield manufacturing environments where high-capacity material handling is the primary requirement. With a 25kg payload capacity, Apollo is better suited for moving standard industrial totes and heavy packages that exceed the lighter lifting capabilities of the Optimus. Industrial integrators should favor Apollo for large-scale warehouse deployments requiring seamless integration with existing software ecosystems via ROS2. While the price point is higher, the robust hardware and open SDK support make it the preferred choice for enterprise-grade supply chain automation where reliability in heavy lifting outweighs the need for high-speed mobility.

When to pick Optimus Gen 2

Opt for the Tesla Optimus Gen 2 when scaling a large fleet for light-duty factory automation or exploring home assistance applications. The significantly lower $30,000 price point and 8-hour runtime allow for high-volume deployments with minimal downtime compared to the Apollo. Its 57kg lightweight frame and 2.5m/s speed make it ideal for agile tasks such as precision sorting or mobile monitoring across large floor plans. Buyers prioritizing cost-efficiency and extended operational cycles over raw payload capacity will find the Optimus more effective for long-shift operations where mobility and battery endurance are the critical constraints.

AI-generated buyer guidance based on public specs.

Ready to evaluate?

Request a vendor quote or compare more options.